![]() ![]() The modjerk doesn't care about content quality, even when the low quality content in question makes the subreddit less fun for everyone. And I think that this would be disadvantageous for the potential future community of this sub, for multiple reasons: However, when that happens, odds are that the moderation "network" (I'll call them the "modjerk") in control over r/paradoxplaza, r/stellaris, r/eu4, r/hoi4, r/imperator, r/tyrannygame and r/victoria2 will request control over r/eu5. Devs added a lot of mana spending gimmicks to it, but it just ended putting the emphasis on how shallower that franchise is compared to other Paradox games.Īnd, it’s a shame because the Early Modern/Colonial era is much interesting to me than any other historical era.Įventually Europa Universalis V will be announced, and this sub will get flooded with new users, creating a community out of nowhere. I get it, it started as a board game, but I can’t help but feel that EU has lost its appeal when it stuck to a simpler gameplay design. I go back to playing EU4, yet it feels like all I can do is paint the map in my colour. ![]() I play HoI for the warfare tactics, and resources management aspects and I can paint the map if I want to. I will soon play Victoria 3 for the socio-economic simulation gameplay, and I can paint the map in my colour if I want to. I play CK3 for the engaging RP elements and I can paint the map if I want to. Loved it, and bought all the Grand strategy games they have made ever since.īut I have to say EU has not aged well compared to the other Paradox franchises. I started playing Paradox’s Grand strategy games when I bought EU1 20 years ago. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |